The Buzz

Here Are the 5 Weapons the U.S. Army Will Need for the next Korean War

The U.S. Army has maintained a continuous presence in South Korea from 1945 to the present day. Today, the Army permanently bases air defense, artillery, aviation and support units in South Korea, plus a heavy-armor brigade combat team that rotates from the continental United States. In the event of war, it flow even more personnel and equipment into the theater to deal with contingencies of invasion, regime collapse and weapons of mass destruction. Here are five weapons the U.S. Army will need if the balloon goes up again in Korea.

Theater High Altitude Air Defense (THAAD)

THAAD is capable of downing short- and medium-range ballistic missiles, of which North Korea has hundreds, from the short-ranged Hwasong-6 and -7 ballistic missiles to the medium-range Nodong. THAAD will be invaluable to protecting key military, economic and political targets in South Korea, particularly those ports and airfields vital for reinforcing U.S. forces in Korea.

Recommended: Why Doesn't America Kill Kim Jong Un? 

Currently, the United States operates one battery of six THAAD launchers, for a total of forty-eight missiles in South Korea, along with a AN/TPY-2 ballistic-missile defense radar. In a crisis, the United States would likely deploy even more THAAD batteries across Asia, including to fill gaps in coverage over South Korea. (South Korea’s capital Seoul, incredibly, is not protected by the current THAAD deployment.)

Recommended: 5 Worst Generals in U.S. History

The Patriot Missile

Originally developed to shoot down aircraft, the Patriot air-defense missile system has forked into two separate weapons, one to shoot down conventional air threats and the other to shoot down ballistic-missile warheads. Together, the two provide all-around protection from virtually all aerial threats—even drones.

Recommended: This Was the Plane That Almost Replaced the F-22 Raptor 

Patriot PAC-2 is the more familiar version of Patriot. PAC-2 is designed to take down anything with wings, from aircraft to cruise missiles. It has some capability against ballistic missiles, but is not the ideal engagement platform for an incoming Scud or No Dong missile. PAC-2 has a range of forty-three miles.

While THAAD takes on high-altitude ballistic-missile threats, the Patriot missile system takes over where THAAD leaves off. The PAC-3 variant, designed for ballistic-missile defense of specific targets such as cities, airfields and headquarters, can intercept incoming missile warheads that THAAD fails to take out. The system has a range of just twelve miles, but a PAC-3 battery launcher can carry sixteen of the smaller missiles as opposed to the four in a PAC-2 launcher.

The M1A2 Abrams Tank

The U.S. Army’s premier main battle tank since the 1980s, the Abrams has been gradually updated in almost all areas, from main gun size to a new digital communications suite. The U.S. Army maintains three combined arms battalions in South Korea equipped with approximately eighty-four M1A2s at any given time.

In a wartime scenario, the Abrams tank will be useful in fending off North Korea’s largely obsolete tank force, which, although numerically superior, has few if any means of inflicting damage on an Abrams tank. Alternately, they could be used to punch a hole in DPRK defenses to spearhead a drive on Pyongyang. Both the U.S. Army and U.S. Marines would use their own versions of the Abrams tank on a Korean battlefield.

M93A1 NBC Reconnaissance Vehicle

The U.S. Army has de-emphasized chemical warfare in recent years, but a conflict on the Korean Peninsula could cause protection against chemical agents to become one of the service’s top priorities. North Korea maintains an estimated 2,500 to five thousand tons of riot, choking, blood, blister and nerve agents. The use of VX nerve agent to assassinate ruler Kim Jong-un’s half-brother Kim Jong-nam in Malaysia suggests the regime would readily use chemical weapons if it they promised a decisive battlefield advantage.

Pages