Is Pentagon Spending Really Leading to ‘Failure’ and ‘Regret’?

December 15, 2015 Topic: Defense Region: United States Blog Brand: The Skeptics Tags: U.S. MilitarySpendingPentagonRANDNational Security

Is Pentagon Spending Really Leading to ‘Failure’ and ‘Regret’?

"Much is said these days about the mismatch of missions and resources for the U.S. military."

Pushing defense responsibilities back on those who actually are threatened, in this case by the Islamic State, Russia and North Korea, is the best way to close the strategy-resource mismatch. After all, noted RAND, if the Baltic and North Korea contingencies occurred at once, The military would require 545,000 personnel, which would mean either 190,000 more active duty or 475,000 more reservists. Better allied nations add to their forces to defend themselves.

RAND’s objection is striking: “this approach ignores the fact that the most capable U.S. allies are currently cutting their ground forces more than we are and that they rely on U.S. ground forces for much of the combat and logistics support they receive during deployed operations.” Yes, because Washington allows them to do so. As long as U.S. officials wander the globe “reassuring” allies which cut military force levels and outlays that America will take care of them, these nations have no incentive to do otherwise. They have become the international variant of the “welfare queens” who President Ronald Reagan once criticized. Like the 1996 welfare reform, cutting the defense dole and telling allies that the good times are over would give them a powerful incentive to reverse course. If they won’t defend themselves, why should Washington do so?

The nations with the greatest regret at not doing more militarily would not be America. The Islamic State poses an existential threat to neighboring states, not America. The Baltic States and Ukraine are chiefly European, not American, concerns. South Korea would be the foremost victim of North Korean aggression or collapse.

Washington should have begun devolving responsibility on its dependents years ago. After all, attempting to run the world is expensive. As the federal budget heads toward collapse from the coming entitlement tsunami Americans will have little choice but to expect their foreign “friends” to do more. The U.S. should start shifting defense responsibilities now.

Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is the author of Foreign Follies: America’s New Global Empire.

Image: Flickr/David B. Gleason