Tehran, Washington and the UAE’s New Terror List
The United Arab Emirates sent a major message to Washington by their inclusion of specifically named, Iranian-backed Shia jihadist organizations in a new list of terrorist organizations. This list has come under a mixture of criticism, praise and some level of confusion for some of its inclusions and exclusions. Much attention has also been placed on the inclusion of Muslim Brotherhood–related organizations, such as the U.S.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). However, it is the addition of Iran’s proxies that deserves equal attention.
Their presence represents the Gulf state’s simmering tensions with their neighbor across the Persian Gulf. The release of the list takes on an added precedence in the context of Western and Iranian leaders meeting in Vienna for negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. For Abu Dhabi, it appears the present danger of Iran’s proxies is just as much of a pressing threat as Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Of the eighty-three listed groups, nine are direct Iranian proxies or contain demonstrable levels of Iranian influence or support. The listed organizations include groups operating in the Arabian Peninsula, including the Houthis of Yemen, Hizballah al-Hijaz (A.K.A. Saudi Hizballah), and “Hizballah in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).” Iraqi Shia groups such as Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq (AAH), the Badr Organization, Kata’ib Hizballah (KH), Liwa Ammar Ibn Yasir (LAIY), and Liwa al-Yum al-Mawud also found places on the list. Even a Shia militia which has essentially become a synonym for the Iranian-organized and -led Shia jihad in Syria, Liwa Abu Fadl al-Abbas (LAFA), was named as a terrorist group.
It’s highly probable that Abu Dhabi released the names of these groups as a further way to snub the United States for a perceived lack of action against Iran’s and its proxies’ moves in the Gulf and/or highlight that the Gulf is not going to march in lockstep with Washington on Iraq or issues dealing with Iran. Speculation on the Gulf-Washington alliance aside, the UAE clearly views Iran’s Shia proxy militias and more covert organizations as a major and expanding threat.
What does the inclusion of these specific groups mean?
The Badr Organization, the largest and oldest of Iran’s Shia proxies in Iraq, was established by Iraqi Shia exiles in Iran around the time of the Iran-Iraq War. The group is also a firm believer in the Iranian ideological system of absolute Wilayat al-Faqih, a structure where religious and political authority is entrusted with Iran’s Supreme Leader.
Badr wields monumental political and military power in Iraq, along with having a history of running sectarian death squads. The group has also been used as a source to create and grow new Iranian-controlled Iraqi Shia militias and political organizations. Badr’s deep links into Iraq’s security establishment have only increased since the 2014 ISIS onslaught and was recently presented with the Ministry of Interior. While Badr has not been listed by the U.S. as a terrorist group, the UAE’s inclusion of the group establishes that the Emirates cares little whether a group is a major player in the Iraqi political system. This theme was accentuated by the UAE’s removal of their ambassador to Iraq in June over “sectarian” politics orchestrated by Baghdad.
Badr is not alone. Kata’ib Hizballah and Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, so-called “special groups” established during the Iraqi War (2003), have been growing in power within Iraq. As with Badr, both organizations are ideologically loyal to Iran.